A private arbitrator has ordered The Washington Post to rehire an opinion columnist who made social media posts that an editor at the paper found “beyond the pale” following the assassination of Charlie Kirk last September.
The New York Times reported that Sarah Miller Espinosa, the arbitrator, said in a written decision Thursday that The Post “did not have good and sufficient cause” to terminate columnist Karen Attiah and “violated” its labor agreement.
“The Washington Post failed to establish the grievant engaged in gross misconduct,” Espinosa wrote, according to a copy of the decision shared with the Times by Attiah’s lawyers.
Following the murder of Kirk at a Turning Point USA event at Utah Valley University on Sept. 10, 2025, Attiah posted on the social media platform Blue Sky, “Refusing to tear my clothes and smear ashes on my face in performative mourning for a white man that espoused violence is … not the same as violence.”
She added in another post, “Part of what keeps America so violent is the insistence that people perform care, empty goodness and absolution for white men who espouse hatred and violence.”
It is not clear what violence she believes Kirk espoused.
Newsweek reported that in another post, Attiah attributed the quote, “Black women do not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously. You have to go steal a white person’s slot” to Kirk.
Did the arbiter get this decision wrong?
Yes: 94% (48 Votes)
No: 6% (3 Votes)
A week later, she wrote: “Hey everyone, in the heat of things, I originally saw this quote in a piece in the Nation, and their quote has since been updated to specify that it was specific to Joy Reid, Michelle Obama, etc. But Kirk’s clearly anti-black statements speak for themselves.”
Adam O’Neal, then the opinion editor at The Washington Post, said in testimony before the arbitrator, according to a transcript of the hearing obtained by the Times, that he read Attiah’s posts the morning after Kirk’s murder.
JUST IN: The Washington Post has fired race hustler Karen Attiah. pic.twitter.com/lPKOfHFR8M
— Bad Hombre (@Badhombre) September 15, 2025
He then sent a message to human resources manager Wayne Connell stating, “Karen’s social media feed yesterday and today is beyond the pale, completely unacceptable for someone associated with Opinions.”
The paper fired Attiah on Sept. 11, 2025. The columnist then brought a wrongful termination suit against the Post in arbitration.
During her testimony, Attiah defended her social media posts, saying that they were part of her work for The Post, “commenting on our discourse on political violence.”
The Times noted, “Arbitration is generally considered binding in most disputes, though courts have occasionally overturned decisions after courtroom findings of fraud or other improprieties. The Post’s labor agreement says that arbitration is binding, though both the company and the employee retain their legal rights.”
Attiah posted on social media on Monday in response to the arbiter ruling in her favor, “The Washington Post fired me last year for speaking the truth after Charlie Kirk’s killing. I fought back.”
BREAKING:
The Washington Post fired me last year for speaking the truth after Charlie Kirk’s killing. I fought back.
I’m happy to announce: I won my case against the Washington Post.
They have been ordered to reinstate me immediately. ✊🏾https://t.co/TISoTvFFO9
— Karen Attiah (@KarenAttiah) August 24, 2026
“I’m happy to announce: I won my case against the Washington Post. They have been ordered to reinstate me immediately,” she added.
The Times reported that Attiah will receive back pay from the time of her firing.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
