November 14, 2024
Harvard University’s chief diversity and inclusion officer is facing accusations that she plagiarized the work of others dozens of times in two published works during her early academic career. The accusations follow the ouster of former university President Claudine Gay, who stepped down amid the fallout of her refusal to...

Harvard University’s chief diversity and inclusion officer is facing accusations that she plagiarized the work of others dozens of times in two published works during her early academic career.

The accusations follow the ouster of former university President Claudine Gay, who stepped down amid the fallout of her refusal to call out anti-Semitism on her campus and complaints she plagiarized the work of others without attribution.

The Washington Free Beacon on Wednesday published a lengthy complaint against Harvard DEI officer Sherri Ann Charleston.

The complaint cited 40 incidents in which it appears Charleston failed to quote others during both her her 2009 dissertation and a 2014 peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Negro Education.

It is not currently clear who filed the complaint, but it stated Charleston’s dissertation “contains a lot of other scholars’ language verbatim without quotation marks.”

Trending:

Biden Sex Assault Accuser Steps Forward with Bombshell Lawsuit, Alleges ‘FBI Operation’ to Silence Her

The lengthy document continued: “Parts of Charleston’s dissertation were published previously, word for word, by her advisor, Rebecca Scott, and others.

“Charleston will lift whole sentences and paragraphs from other scholars’ work without quotation marks, then add a correct reference somewhere in the footnote ending the long paragraph.”

The complainant laid out excerpts from each paper and then provided what appeared to be identical or near-identical paragraphs from other authors.

In one example of alleged plagiarism, Harvard’s head of DEI’s only notable edit to the alleged work of another writer was to shorten a subject’s middle name to an initial.

Should Charleston resign?

Yes: 99% (162 Votes)

No: 1% (1 Votes)

The complaint also noted that in many instances, it appeared that Charleston changed sentences and entire paragraphs simply by adding words and phrases such as “consequently,” “likewise” and “as such.”

According to the document, one person Charleston appeared to have lifted work from is her husband, LaVar Charleston.

The Free Beacon reported it appeared that in the 2014 study, Charleston used “sleight of hand” to pass off Mr. Charleston’s 2012 work as her own.

The published article had a co-author — Jerlando Jackson, the current dean of Michigan State University’s College of Education.

It is not clear if Jackson was aware he co-published a study in which much of the work appeared to belong to another individual.

Related:

Harvard University Slapped with Massive Lawsuit Alleging Civil Rights Violations

Charleston has not commented on the plagiarism allegations.

NBC News, which categorized the Free Beacon’s journalism as a “campaign” against the Harvard DEI officer, reported it reached out to the school about the complaint against her.

The school declined to say if it will investigate Charleston but did provide the far-left network a statement on the accusations through school spokesman Jason Newton.

“Harvard is a community that embraces diversity in backgrounds, experiences and perspectives,” Newton said.

“Through her leadership as Chief Diversity and Inclusion Officer, Sherri Ann Charleston has advanced our belief that everyone who comes to Harvard belongs at Harvard and, whether a student, faculty, staff member or researcher, should have the opportunity to succeed,” Newton added.

Gay stepped down as Harvard’s president last month and is the shortest-tenured president of the Ivy League school’s storied history.


A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:

I heard a chilling comment the other day: “We don’t even know if an election will be held in 2024.” 

That wasn’t said by a conspiracy theorist or a doomsday prophet. No, former U.S. national security advisor Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said that to the founder of The Western Journal, Floyd Brown.

Gen. Flynn’s warning means that the 2024 election is the most important election for every single living American. If we lose this one to the wealthy elites who hate us, hate God, and hate what America stands for, we can only assume that 248 years of American history and the values we hold dear to our hearts may soon vanish.

The end game is here, and as Benjamin Franklin said, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

All of this means that without you, it’s over. We have the platform, the journalists, and the experience to fight back hard, but Big Tech is strangling us through advertising blacklists, shadow bans, and algorithms. Did you know that we’ve been blacklisted by 90% of advertisers? Without direct support from you, our readers, we can’t continue the fight.

Can we count on your support? It may not seem like much, but a Western Journal Membership can make all the difference in the world because when you support us directly, you cut Big Tech out of the picture. They lose control. 

A monthly Western Journal Membership costs less than one coffee and breakfast sandwich each month, and it gets you access to ALL of our content — news, commentary, and premium articles. You’ll experience a radically reduced number of ads, and most importantly you will be vitally supporting the fight for America’s soul in 2024.

We are literally counting on you because without our members, The Western Journal would cease to exist. Will you join us in the fight? 

Sincerely,

Josh Manning

Deputy Managing Editor

The Western Journal