<!–

–>

December 17, 2022

On Nov. 13, 2022, the occupant of the Oval Office signed into law the so-called “Respect for Marriage Act,” It codifies same-sex “marriage” into Federal law in a nasty way, leaving anyone who disagrees open to lawsuits and other severe legal consequences. 

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); }

Its passage by Congress (with the help of numerous “moderate” Republicans) has been bewailed by conservative groups.  But let’s not fool ourselves.  This didn’t happen because of some weak-kneed RINOs.  It’s the result of a near-total capitulation of the conservative movement on the marriage issue over recent decades, which has trickled up to Congress.

In the critical weeks before its final passage by both the House and Senate, major pro-family groups spent lots of money and energy lobbying tirelessly against it.  These groups were at the same time polishing their image as stalwart defenders of the family (in their ongoing appeals for funding from conservative citizens). 

But with all that effort, here’s what Congress and the public did not hear from the mainstream conservatives as reasons to defeat the bill:

  • The Supreme Court’s 5-4 Obergefell ruling that supposedly “legalized” same-sex marriage was a complete political sham having no basis in actual constitutional law.  (In addition, two of the liberal justices should have recused themselves.) As Justice Clarence Thomas hinted, it needs to be scrapped.  To claim that the Constitution includes or implies such a “right” is simply nonsense.  Previously, dozens of states rightly banned same-sex marriage to underscore that truth.
  • You can’t repeal the laws of nature.  There is no such thing as same-sex “marriage.” The concept is an invention of the LGBT movement.  The federal government cannot force people to believe a lie.
  • Same-sex marriage enshrines into law a behavior that is fraught with horrible medical and psychological problems.  America’s medical associations have shamelessly — and completely unscientifically — sold out on this point.
  • Not the least, there is the religious aspect that is well known to nearly everyone.  To put it succinctly, men using one another as women will always constitute a perversion.  Don’t blame me; blame God.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); }

The political wimps on our side constantly insist that saying these things won’t help and will anger the leftists, and we need to sound moderate and reasonable.  They’re wrong.  Boldly repeating these truths actually moves the whole political discourse to the right.  Ignoring them has the opposite effect.

But conservative leaders don’t want to be called “bigots.” And they don’t want to alienate the false Republicans who go along with same-sex marriage.  They might want their votes on other bills — or their donations.

So instead, there was really just one message from our side.  It centered on “religious freedom.” It basically said: “If you insist on passing this, there must be some religious freedom protections added.  People with ‘sincerely held religious beliefs’ against same-sex marriage need safeguards.”

What about people who don’t have “sincerely held religious beliefs” but just think that gay marriage is disgusting, unhealthy, or destabilizing for society? And who gets to determine whether one’s beliefs are sufficiently “sincere”? Our side’s argument was weak as dishwater, and the leftists basically laughed at us. 

Yes, it is true that religious liberty is in serious danger with this new law.  But our willingness to concede everything else while fighting that battle sent a clear m

essage that we weren’t really serious.