Special counsel John Durham should not have the final say in his investigation seeking out misconduct in the FBI‘s Russia inquiry, says an Obama-era spokesman for the Justice Department.
Matthew Miller, who was director of the Justice Department’s public affairs office from 2009 to 2011, argued Attorney General Merrick Garland, or another top official at the agency, should review the report Durham is expected to prepare by the end of the year before making a decision on releasing its findings to the public.
The challenge to Garland to take a “pause” followed a jury in Alexandria, Virginia, finding Russian national Igor Danchenko not guilty Tuesday on several false statements charges over allegations that the main source of British ex-spy Christopher Steele lied to the FBI about his sourcing for the now-discredited anti-Trump dossier. MSNBC host Alex Wagner asked Miller whether Durham’s endeavor is coming to an end.
‘DOWN THE TUBES’: SEAN SPICER RAGES AFTER JOHN DURHAM LOSES ANOTHER RUSSIAGATE CASE
“His cases are over. I think it’s clear that he’s not going to bring any more charges in this investigation, but one of the requirements for special counsels under the regulations is that they write a confidential report and submit it to the attorney general, and the attorney general then makes a decision whether to release that report to the public,” Miller said.
Miller made a comparison to special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation and then-Attorney General William Barr’s controversial rollout of his report in 2019.
“I think Merrick Garland will be under a lot of pressure from Republicans to release that report, but I have to say, this circumstance is very different from the Mueller investigation, where, obviously, the attorney general, Bill Barr, did that report,” he said.
“It’s different because in that case, the subject of that investigation could not be charged, and so it was appropriate for the department to make its findings public, so Congress could decide whether to impeach and convict the then-sitting president,” Miller added. “That is not the case here, so to release a report in this instance — given what we know about the way that Durham has behaved, some of his inappropriate public statements during this investigation, the poor judgments he has made in bringing these charges — to release a report publicly and let him have the final word I think probably unfairly tarnish some people at the FBI that we know he holds ill will to based on some of the things he said in this most recent trial.”
Durham’s investigation began more than three years ago. Although the prosecutor has secured one conviction so far, the only other case he’s brought, against lawyer Michael Sussmann, ended in acquittal. While former President Donald Trump and his allies claim the businessman-turned-politician was unfairly targeted in a bid to undermine his campaign and presidency, Democrats and some legal observers claim the inquiry is meant to undercut Mueller’s special counsel investigation and inflict damage on Trump’s political foes.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Garland testified to the Senate last October that “with respect to the report, I would like as much as possible to be made public — I have to be concerned about Privacy Act concerns and classification, but other than that, the commitment is to provide a public report, yes.” Garland also vowed, “There will be no political or otherwise undue interference with the Durham investigation.”
Durham has not signaled publicly where he might take his investigation next, but Miller said, “I think the attorney general would be wise to take a pause before releasing that report, maybe let another senior career official at the Justice Department review it and decide whether John Durham really is the person that gets to have the final word on the Russian investigation.”
