November 5, 2024
Perth Mint Sold Billions In Diluted Gold To China, Tried To Cover It Up; Report

Over the years, we have periodically reported (here, here, here, and here) of the occasional gold bar discovered as counterfeit, including gold-plated tungsten bars, but most (if not all) have been via third-party fraudsters.

'This time is different' however, as overnight reports via Australia's ABC News claims that the historic Perth Mint is facing a potential $9 billion recall of gold bars after selling diluted or "doped" bullion to China and then covering it up, according to a leaked internal report.

Gold doping is a somewhat accepted practice in the industry and is not illegal, but is high risk for refiners, as it lowers the quality of bullion by adding impurities like silver or copper.

[ABC News] uncovered documents charting the WA government-owned mint's decision to begin "doping" its gold in 2018, and then how it withheld evidence from its largest client in an effort to protect its reputation.

While the gold remained above broader industry standards, the report estimated up to 100 tonnes of gold sent to Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) potentially did not comply with Shanghai's strict purity standards for silver content.

One Perth Mint insider, who asked not to be named as they could face five years' jail if their identity is revealed, says it is a "scandal of the highest level".

"I don't know if I've ever seen one this big," they say.

 

The mint began doping its gold as a cost-saving measure in 2018, expecting to save up to $620,000 a year - a tiny fraction of its annual sales.

“At all times the gold bars the Perth Mint produced and sold contained at least 99.99 per cent gold, as per their specifications. This has never been in dispute,” the mint claimed in a statement after the news broke.

“These purity specifications are aligned with industry standards and akin with those set by the international market authority, the London Bullion Market Association.

“In September 2021, the Perth Mint was made aware that some of its one-kilogram bars may not have met the non-gold specifications of the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE). The SGE specifications demand that the non-gold component – that is, 0.01 per cent of the bar or 100 parts per million (ppm) – contains no more than 50 ppm silver.”

However, as ABC reports, just months after the doping began, the leaked internal report says refinery staff identified concerns that silver and copper levels may have exceeded those allowed by the SGE.

Despite this, refinery staff continued doping the gold.

The extent of the mint’s potential exposure if the SGE went public with its concerns and demanded a recall was outlined in the findings of the internal investigation leaked to ABC and made public on Monday night.

“If SGE – Gold Corporation’s pre-eminent exchange client – had made public that they had issues with Gold Corporation bars … the impact of negative public statements on the business could be very significant,” the internal investigation found.

“Based on average understandings of volumes … it was possible for up to 100 tonnes of stock to be recalled from the SGE for replacement.”

In a further, more political twist, Western Australia's Opposition Leader Shane Love on Tuesday called for a royal commission into the mint on the back of the “gold doping” claims, which stem from a period when West Australian premier Mark McGowan was the minister responsible for the organisation.

The longer-term damage to the mint's reputation stands to be far greater.

"Potentially you'll get gold buyers in the market going, 'Can we trust anything coming out of the Perth Mint? Including coins, bullion, anything?'," the insider says.

"It happened in the first place because of poor systems management and incompetence on the refining side. But once they found it, they knew what they were doing. They took deliberate actions to ensure this didn't get out."

Interestingly, gold prices are puking this morning. While the dollar is stronger, this move seems more aggressive...

Is this a loss of 'trust' in the barbarous relic?

As one twitter wit noted: 'Bitcoin fixes this'.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/08/2023 - 06:22

Over the years, we have periodically reported (here, here, here, and here) of the occasional gold bar discovered as counterfeit, including gold-plated tungsten bars, but most (if not all) have been via third-party fraudsters.

‘This time is different’ however, as overnight reports via Australia’s ABC News claims that the historic Perth Mint is facing a potential $9 billion recall of gold bars after selling diluted or “doped” bullion to China and then covering it up, according to a leaked internal report.

Gold doping is a somewhat accepted practice in the industry and is not illegal, but is high risk for refiners, as it lowers the quality of bullion by adding impurities like silver or copper.

[ABC News] uncovered documents charting the WA government-owned mint’s decision to begin “doping” its gold in 2018, and then how it withheld evidence from its largest client in an effort to protect its reputation.

While the gold remained above broader industry standards, the report estimated up to 100 tonnes of gold sent to Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE) potentially did not comply with Shanghai’s strict purity standards for silver content.

One Perth Mint insider, who asked not to be named as they could face five years’ jail if their identity is revealed, says it is a “scandal of the highest level”.

“I don’t know if I’ve ever seen one this big,” they say.

 

The mint began doping its gold as a cost-saving measure in 2018, expecting to save up to $620,000 a year – a tiny fraction of its annual sales.

“At all times the gold bars the Perth Mint produced and sold contained at least 99.99 per cent gold, as per their specifications. This has never been in dispute,” the mint claimed in a statement after the news broke.

“These purity specifications are aligned with industry standards and akin with those set by the international market authority, the London Bullion Market Association.

“In September 2021, the Perth Mint was made aware that some of its one-kilogram bars may not have met the non-gold specifications of the Shanghai Gold Exchange (SGE). The SGE specifications demand that the non-gold component – that is, 0.01 per cent of the bar or 100 parts per million (ppm) – contains no more than 50 ppm silver.”

However, as ABC reports, just months after the doping began, the leaked internal report says refinery staff identified concerns that silver and copper levels may have exceeded those allowed by the SGE.

Despite this, refinery staff continued doping the gold.

The extent of the mint’s potential exposure if the SGE went public with its concerns and demanded a recall was outlined in the findings of the internal investigation leaked to ABC and made public on Monday night.

“If SGE – Gold Corporation’s pre-eminent exchange client – had made public that they had issues with Gold Corporation bars … the impact of negative public statements on the business could be very significant,” the internal investigation found.

“Based on average understandings of volumes … it was possible for up to 100 tonnes of stock to be recalled from the SGE for replacement.”

[embedded content]

In a further, more political twist, Western Australia’s Opposition Leader Shane Love on Tuesday called for a royal commission into the mint on the back of the “gold doping” claims, which stem from a period when West Australian premier Mark McGowan was the minister responsible for the organisation.

The longer-term damage to the mint’s reputation stands to be far greater.

“Potentially you’ll get gold buyers in the market going, ‘Can we trust anything coming out of the Perth Mint? Including coins, bullion, anything?’,” the insider says.

“It happened in the first place because of poor systems management and incompetence on the refining side. But once they found it, they knew what they were doing. They took deliberate actions to ensure this didn’t get out.”

Interestingly, gold prices are puking this morning. While the dollar is stronger, this move seems more aggressive…

Is this a loss of ‘trust’ in the barbarous relic?

As one twitter wit noted: ‘Bitcoin fixes this’.

Loading…