<!–

–>

March 24, 2023

In Act 2 of Shakespeare’s Hamlet the beleaguered prince is alone onstage reading. His tutor, Polonius, enters and they have this exchange:

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); }

Polonius: What do you read, my lord? 
Hamlet: Words, words, words. 
Polonius: What is the matter, my lord? 
Hamlet: Between who? 
Polonius: I mean, the matter that you read, my lord.

“Words, words, words.” Later on in the play, in the midst of Hamlet’s famous soliloquy he says, “Aye, that is the rub.”  Indeed, that is the rub. Words — words that have been stolen from us to make any kind of intelligent discussion impossible. Not only has the Left tainted the words necessary to a free society, but we find ourselves adrift, trying in vain to find words to replace those lost.

What are we to call terrorists if decent middle-class parents at school board meetings are also terrorists? How do we talk about elections if the outcomes of such traditions are bought and paid for long in advance? If Anthony Fauci is an “expert,” then what do we call people who really know what they are doing? 

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); }

It is normal for words to morph into new shapes and fill new voids — the word “virus” now has both disease and computer applications — no harm in that. Language is always fluid when it’s left alone to meet our language needs. But another, more sinister force is at work here. Our language is being purposely perverted to make not only discussion difficult, but to make thought itself impossible.

How do we deal with those who shout democracy, but really want communism? The word “democracy” has been so besmirched by dictators all over the globe that it’s basically useless anyway, but it has become a thoughtless drumbeat used to rally the troops of the Left. Self-government is way too important a concept to be associated with such worn and useless language, but here we are.

The words that are being beaten to death are seriously important words. “Truth” and “lie” are good examples. The Left will say anything, even when we know, and they know we know, that they are lying. “Truth” has become nothing more than ice cream — we all get our own favorite flavor and whether or not our flavor bears any connection at all to reality has ceased to matter. If that’s not bad enough, leftists will then turn around and call us the liars. I trust no one who denies absolute truth (as if there is any other kind), and I am sure that a society based on lies cannot survive because trust, which is based on truth, is the lubricant that keeps the whole machine turning.

The word “science” has also taken a thrashing. It used to connote knowledge (i.e. “truth”), integrity, painstaking accuracy. We used to equate “science” with reliability and honesty, with fact. If COVID taught us anything, it has wised us up to the duplicity of those who make their billions by inventing diseases and then, presto-change-o, also selling the vaccine. Now we understand the connection between big pharma and the government — an unholy alliance if there ever was one. There was a time when a man in a white lab coat was the symbol of care and concern and validity. But now we equate those coats with Anthony Fauci or Bill Nye the “Science” Guy (who merely has a bachelor’s degree in engineering.) We have trusted where we shouldn’t have and the consequences are becoming more horrible every day.  We no longer trust our doctors, and we certainly don’t trust the pharmaceutical industry, nor the media people who follow their lead.

We are accused of believing in “conspiracy theories” even after the “theories” are demonstrable fact. So, what are we to call our discoveries? How do we think about and discuss the spider-web of interconnections amongst federal agencies, courts, corporations, and law enforcement? When we notice the tangle and follow the money and the power, we are aghast, but the media — whose job used to be to speak truth to power — just sweep the scandals under the carpet and point accusatory fingers at those of us crying, “Foul!”

Can we call these webs “treason,” or is that word already so tainted that it also can no longer carry meaning? Does anyone today have the courage to actually, legally use that term and apply the legal consequences? Apparently not.