Authored by Brent Hamacheck via American Greatness,
In my recently published book, Dissidently Speaking: Change the Words. Change the War: I use both logic and empiricism to prove (I do mean prove) that there is absolutely no such thing as “right wing-left wing” as we use the terms in this country. They are nothing more than non-defined terms used to characterize and label people with whom we don’t agree. I will go so far as to say that the terms are a socially acceptable form of hate speech.
When we say that “the left hates Donald Trump,” it isn’t just mistaken; it’s fallacious.
Since there is no such thing as “left-right,” as we use the terms, there is no possible way for the “left” to hate Trump.
But he is hated by many, and there are three reasons why.
If you are a Trump supporter, there is some good news to be found in this article. It will give you a way to potentially break through and change the minds of people in two of the three groups, and it will also help you to focus whatever hostile energy you need to dispense upon the third group, one that you cannot change and one that poses a threat to what some ignorantly label as our democracy but is more correctly understood as our republic.
Since people like acronyms, catchy abbreviations, and words that can be turned into hashtags, I will frame my breakdown of the three reasons people hate Donald Trump as the Triple S’s: Silly, Subconscious, and Sinister.
Let’s take them in order.
First are the “sillies.” These are people who hate Trump purely because of his demeanor. They don’t like the way he throws insults around, the way he has been caught on tape talking about women, or any of a number of other reasons that relate to personal attributes as opposed to matters of policy or his ability to govern. I say this is silliness because we are not voting for a person; we are voting for the president. Many of the people in this group, when you ask them about Trump’s policies, agree with much or most of what he tried to do or wants to do as president. The idea that they are putting personality above policy or principle is simply silly.
They are not asking Trump to do magic tricks and entertain the children at their five-year-old daughter’s birthday party. If they like, they can ask Barack Obama to do that. He seems congenial enough. The real question is, would you rather have Obama’s smile and his socialist approach to governance, or would you rather have a somewhat caustic and abrasive person (Winston Churchill comes to mind) who tries to do what you think is better for the nation?
A quick note to say that I am making no attempt to endorse or criticize Donald Trump. I am simply identifying why people hate him. I am going to spend a moment on the term “hate” shortly.
The second group of folks with what gets called “Trump derangement syndrome” are those who hate the candidate-in-chief for reasons that are subconscious or subliminal.
There are three main drivers of this subconscious hatred. They are guilt, shame, and altruism.
Donald Trump is unapologetic in his love of country and his claims that America is exceptional and that the needs of our nation and its citizens must be placed first in any and all considerations involving domestic policy or foreign diplomacy. This message resonates with at least half the nation, and the fire and brimstone with which he delivers it explains the energy and enthusiasm found at his rallies. Every Trump appearance feels like the Beatles landing in America in 1964.
For a large number of people, however, while they are experiencing the rich bounty that is daily life in the United States, they know that not everyone within our borders enjoys it to the same extent they do, and even fewer do so outside of our borders. They carry with them a feeling of guilt that they are doing so well, that their lives are so comfortable, and that they simply can’t support a person who runs around saying that America is great and Americans come first. To see Donald Trump aggressively touting such a message makes them feel ashamed. Nobody likes feeling ashamed.
Guilt and shame then feed into one of, if not the most, destructive of all human thought patterns, which is that of altruism. This is the notion that self-sacrifice is the highest form of virtue. This abhorrent concept (often associated with Christianity, which is interesting insofar as the term and the concept were created 1800 years after Christ’s death and by an atheist at that) tears at the mind of many who find it difficult to spend their daily lives struggling with the notion that in order to be good they need to be willing to harm, or even destroy, themselves in the process.
Take a person who is already in inner conflict, feeling guilty, ashamed, and needing to sacrifice, and give them Donald Trump, who effectively screams “No! Don’t do that!” into their ears, and you can get an almost involuntary, subconscious, visceral internal revolt. While voices inside their heads are screaming to be ashamed of America, Donald Trump is screaming to be proud of America from the outside. They hate him for the conflict he brings into their lives.
These first two groups of Trump haters can be reached through constructive engagement, genuine questioning and listening, and the patient and persistent application of both.
There is a third group of Trump haters who cannot be reached and with whom all must reckon.
Those are the sinister ones—the ones who are not conflicted by Trump’s “America first” message but who are instead vehemently opposed to it.
These are the people who are rightly labeled as globalists—people who want America to recede into the middle of a heterogenous, global community, setting its strong nation-state aside and becoming no more significant in world affairs than are the nations of Chad, Azerbaijan, or Guyana. “Lead from behind” is just one of the more coffee mug-ready ideas that they hold, all of which seek to have us become part of Orwell’s Oceania.
These people don’t want to confront China; they want to make money with it. These people do not want to protect our borders; they want to open them so that we can water down our national identity. These people don’t want us to be energy independent; they want to tilt at energy windmills by installing actual windmills and curry favor with the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (two decidedly anti-American and anti-Trump organizations).
This sinister group, hateful of the very thought of American supremacy, simply detests Donald Trump and knows that he has created an awakening among his followers as to their designs to rebuild an unleavened America. They truly hate the man, and they consciously and irrationally want him off the stage. How far will they go to give him the hook? I will let you conjecture in the same manner as we are left to conjecture the veracity of results in the 2020 election or the assassination of JFK.
You cannot convert this third group, but you can’t ignore them either. These folks who want world membership instead of leadership are not going away, and they are not going to recede into the shadows. If you are a Trump supporter and if you like the whole concept of America first, then your best bet is to work with members of the first two groups of Trump-haters and strive for conversions. Only with numbers can you control the threat from the “sinisters.”
I want to address why I am using the term “hate” (one my mother told me never to use). I chose it not to defend it in any metaphysical sense but simply to pick a term that generally conveys intensity. For the most part, the typical person opposed to Trump is not one with a pair of reading glasses on their nose, an opera playbill in their hand, and an affected English accent, claiming they have some subtle points of contention with the man’s positions. The strength and intensity of his delivery create the same kind of equal and opposite reaction within those for whom it does not resonate. It is Newtonian.
Perhaps, a bit twisted and imperfect in its logic, we can say that Donald Trump’s love of country generates feelings of hatred, love’s literary opposite, in response?
I have long been on record as predicting that Joe Biden will not be the man on the actual ballot come November. It made perfect sense for the Democrats to run him for reelection so as to not turn his presidency into one of lame duck status two years into his first term. That said, the current president clearly suffers from cognitive decline and cannot serve another four years. I also believe he cannot actually beat Donald Trump in November, save for the intervention of some Herculean election tampering efforts.
If I am wrong and Biden is on the ballot in November, then Trump supporters have much less to fear from the Trump haters. If, however, my prediction that he is replaced at the convention (my long-held fear is that Michelle Obama steps in; I see her as unbeatable) after stepping aside for “personal reasons” comes true, then reaching out to the first two categories of Trump haters becomes far more important. You will need to flip some of them. You will not be able to do it by going to Trump rallies and posting on your social media, where other Trump followers follow you. You will need to meet them on their turf, on their platforms, and in their living rooms. This will not be a home game for you. You are going to have to go on the road and put on your away jersey.
I wish you strength, courage, and success. While my own personal feelings about the former president are mixed, my strong opposition to the third group of his haters is clear and unwavering. It needs to be a sort of political “Great Commission” to go out and make believers not out of all three nations of Trump haters, just the first two.
* * *
Brent Hamachek is the author of the recent Amazon top new release, Dissidently Speaking: Change the Words. Change the War. The book is a commentary on the divisions all too common in today’s America. All proceeds from its sale go to support a not-for-profit dedicated to promoting constructive engagement between young people.
Authored by Brent Hamacheck via American Greatness,
In my recently published book, Dissidently Speaking: Change the Words. Change the War: I use both logic and empiricism to prove (I do mean prove) that there is absolutely no such thing as “right wing-left wing” as we use the terms in this country. They are nothing more than non-defined terms used to characterize and label people with whom we don’t agree. I will go so far as to say that the terms are a socially acceptable form of hate speech.
When we say that “the left hates Donald Trump,” it isn’t just mistaken; it’s fallacious.
Since there is no such thing as “left-right,” as we use the terms, there is no possible way for the “left” to hate Trump.
But he is hated by many, and there are three reasons why.
If you are a Trump supporter, there is some good news to be found in this article. It will give you a way to potentially break through and change the minds of people in two of the three groups, and it will also help you to focus whatever hostile energy you need to dispense upon the third group, one that you cannot change and one that poses a threat to what some ignorantly label as our democracy but is more correctly understood as our republic.
Since people like acronyms, catchy abbreviations, and words that can be turned into hashtags, I will frame my breakdown of the three reasons people hate Donald Trump as the Triple S’s: Silly, Subconscious, and Sinister.
Let’s take them in order.
First are the “sillies.” These are people who hate Trump purely because of his demeanor. They don’t like the way he throws insults around, the way he has been caught on tape talking about women, or any of a number of other reasons that relate to personal attributes as opposed to matters of policy or his ability to govern. I say this is silliness because we are not voting for a person; we are voting for the president. Many of the people in this group, when you ask them about Trump’s policies, agree with much or most of what he tried to do or wants to do as president. The idea that they are putting personality above policy or principle is simply silly.
They are not asking Trump to do magic tricks and entertain the children at their five-year-old daughter’s birthday party. If they like, they can ask Barack Obama to do that. He seems congenial enough. The real question is, would you rather have Obama’s smile and his socialist approach to governance, or would you rather have a somewhat caustic and abrasive person (Winston Churchill comes to mind) who tries to do what you think is better for the nation?
A quick note to say that I am making no attempt to endorse or criticize Donald Trump. I am simply identifying why people hate him. I am going to spend a moment on the term “hate” shortly.
The second group of folks with what gets called “Trump derangement syndrome” are those who hate the candidate-in-chief for reasons that are subconscious or subliminal.
There are three main drivers of this subconscious hatred. They are guilt, shame, and altruism.
Donald Trump is unapologetic in his love of country and his claims that America is exceptional and that the needs of our nation and its citizens must be placed first in any and all considerations involving domestic policy or foreign diplomacy. This message resonates with at least half the nation, and the fire and brimstone with which he delivers it explains the energy and enthusiasm found at his rallies. Every Trump appearance feels like the Beatles landing in America in 1964.
For a large number of people, however, while they are experiencing the rich bounty that is daily life in the United States, they know that not everyone within our borders enjoys it to the same extent they do, and even fewer do so outside of our borders. They carry with them a feeling of guilt that they are doing so well, that their lives are so comfortable, and that they simply can’t support a person who runs around saying that America is great and Americans come first. To see Donald Trump aggressively touting such a message makes them feel ashamed. Nobody likes feeling ashamed.
Guilt and shame then feed into one of, if not the most, destructive of all human thought patterns, which is that of altruism. This is the notion that self-sacrifice is the highest form of virtue. This abhorrent concept (often associated with Christianity, which is interesting insofar as the term and the concept were created 1800 years after Christ’s death and by an atheist at that) tears at the mind of many who find it difficult to spend their daily lives struggling with the notion that in order to be good they need to be willing to harm, or even destroy, themselves in the process.
Take a person who is already in inner conflict, feeling guilty, ashamed, and needing to sacrifice, and give them Donald Trump, who effectively screams “No! Don’t do that!” into their ears, and you can get an almost involuntary, subconscious, visceral internal revolt. While voices inside their heads are screaming to be ashamed of America, Donald Trump is screaming to be proud of America from the outside. They hate him for the conflict he brings into their lives.
These first two groups of Trump haters can be reached through constructive engagement, genuine questioning and listening, and the patient and persistent application of both.
There is a third group of Trump haters who cannot be reached and with whom all must reckon.
Those are the sinister ones—the ones who are not conflicted by Trump’s “America first” message but who are instead vehemently opposed to it.
These are the people who are rightly labeled as globalists—people who want America to recede into the middle of a heterogenous, global community, setting its strong nation-state aside and becoming no more significant in world affairs than are the nations of Chad, Azerbaijan, or Guyana. “Lead from behind” is just one of the more coffee mug-ready ideas that they hold, all of which seek to have us become part of Orwell’s Oceania.
These people don’t want to confront China; they want to make money with it. These people do not want to protect our borders; they want to open them so that we can water down our national identity. These people don’t want us to be energy independent; they want to tilt at energy windmills by installing actual windmills and curry favor with the United Nations and the World Economic Forum (two decidedly anti-American and anti-Trump organizations).
This sinister group, hateful of the very thought of American supremacy, simply detests Donald Trump and knows that he has created an awakening among his followers as to their designs to rebuild an unleavened America. They truly hate the man, and they consciously and irrationally want him off the stage. How far will they go to give him the hook? I will let you conjecture in the same manner as we are left to conjecture the veracity of results in the 2020 election or the assassination of JFK.
You cannot convert this third group, but you can’t ignore them either. These folks who want world membership instead of leadership are not going away, and they are not going to recede into the shadows. If you are a Trump supporter and if you like the whole concept of America first, then your best bet is to work with members of the first two groups of Trump-haters and strive for conversions. Only with numbers can you control the threat from the “sinisters.”
I want to address why I am using the term “hate” (one my mother told me never to use). I chose it not to defend it in any metaphysical sense but simply to pick a term that generally conveys intensity. For the most part, the typical person opposed to Trump is not one with a pair of reading glasses on their nose, an opera playbill in their hand, and an affected English accent, claiming they have some subtle points of contention with the man’s positions. The strength and intensity of his delivery create the same kind of equal and opposite reaction within those for whom it does not resonate. It is Newtonian.
Perhaps, a bit twisted and imperfect in its logic, we can say that Donald Trump’s love of country generates feelings of hatred, love’s literary opposite, in response?
I have long been on record as predicting that Joe Biden will not be the man on the actual ballot come November. It made perfect sense for the Democrats to run him for reelection so as to not turn his presidency into one of lame duck status two years into his first term. That said, the current president clearly suffers from cognitive decline and cannot serve another four years. I also believe he cannot actually beat Donald Trump in November, save for the intervention of some Herculean election tampering efforts.
If I am wrong and Biden is on the ballot in November, then Trump supporters have much less to fear from the Trump haters. If, however, my prediction that he is replaced at the convention (my long-held fear is that Michelle Obama steps in; I see her as unbeatable) after stepping aside for “personal reasons” comes true, then reaching out to the first two categories of Trump haters becomes far more important. You will need to flip some of them. You will not be able to do it by going to Trump rallies and posting on your social media, where other Trump followers follow you. You will need to meet them on their turf, on their platforms, and in their living rooms. This will not be a home game for you. You are going to have to go on the road and put on your away jersey.
I wish you strength, courage, and success. While my own personal feelings about the former president are mixed, my strong opposition to the third group of his haters is clear and unwavering. It needs to be a sort of political “Great Commission” to go out and make believers not out of all three nations of Trump haters, just the first two.
* * *
Brent Hamachek is the author of the recent Amazon top new release, Dissidently Speaking: Change the Words. Change the War. The book is a commentary on the divisions all too common in today’s America. All proceeds from its sale go to support a not-for-profit dedicated to promoting constructive engagement between young people.
Loading…
