Premium
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, right. sharply disagreed with the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts, left. (Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images; Andrew Harnik / Getty Images)
June 29, 2026 at 2:35pm
The U.S. Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts exhibits two qualities in abundance: irony and sophistry.
Thank goodness, therefore, for Justice Clarence Thomas, one of the few modern jurists who understands the Constitution.
On Monday, a 5-4 SCOTUS majority issued the constitutionally indefensible ruling that President Donald Trump, in whom all Article II powers inhere, somehow lacks the authority to immediately fire Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, who allegedly committed mortgage fraud — a decision that, in Thomas’ words, effectively reinterpreted the Constitution as a document framed to promote “technocratic governance” at the expense of the “common people.”
Read the Rest — Subscribe Now
You’ve reached the end of the free preview.
Join thousands who rely on us for trusted news.
Already a subscriber?
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.