<!–

–>

August 3, 2023

Vladimir Putin is not a great statesman.  His admirers don’t want to admit this.  But the last 17 months of war have made it hard to keep up the illusion.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); document.write(”); googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().addEventListener(‘slotRenderEnded’, function(event) { if (event.slot.getSlotElementId() == “div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3028”) { googletag.display(“div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3028”); } }); }); }

There are a lot of Americans who are happy about the ineptitude of Russia’s leadership class.  I am not one of them.

The fact is that the United States and Russia are kindred civilizations, springing from the same cultural rootstock in Christian Europe.  In the twentieth century, both nations fell under the control of forces that have done their best to destroy that heritage; now both countries have political factions that want to reverse that decline.  Real American patriots and traditionalists have reasons to cheer on Russia’s successes, and vice versa.

For better or worse, Putin has spent the last 24 years as the leader of Russia’s traditionalist, restoration-minded faction.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); document.write(”); googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().addEventListener(‘slotRenderEnded’, function(event) { if (event.slot.getSlotElementId() == “div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3035”) { googletag.display(“div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3035”); } }); }); }

From Boris Yeltsin, who spent most of his presidency drunk, Vladimir Putin inherited a shambles of a country.  In 1999, the Russian fertility rate was 1.19.  GDP was 38 percent of what it was when the Soviet Union fell.  Corruption and crime were rampant.  Life expectancy had fallen from 67.6 years to 65.0, driven mainly by alcoholism.

President Putin recognized the severity of the situation.  Upon coming to power, he cracked down on crime, limited the power of plutocrats and foreign investors, and rebuilt many of the public industries that had been allowed to decay at the bidding of globalist advisers from the Clinton administration.  As a result, the GDP, the fertility rate, and the life expectancy all went up.

But the revival lasted only so long.  Russia’s fertility rate peaked at 1.76 in 2016, then resumed declining.  Exports peaked in 2012, then entered a ragged plateau.  Despite huge state support for the Russian Orthodox Church, only some 7 percent of Russians attend services weekly.

And over the last decade or so, Putin has responded to these failures by becoming increasingly bitter, obsessing over the decadence and perfidy of NATO and the West in general, and blaming foreigners for his country’s problems.

What he has not done is to crack down on the corruption and cronyism that make Russia an unattractive place to do business, and which have left the country stuck with a quasi-third-world economy based mainly on raw materials extraction rather than manufacturing.  Nor has Putin made any real effort to stamp out electoral fraud, or create a multiparty political system with legislatures strong enough to hold ministers accountable for their abuses — this, despite the fact that his party is popular enough that it would probably stay in power even with clean elections.

Putin’s most die-hard apologists respond to this kind of thing by saying that democracy is a sort of corroding agent that weakens the authority of the state, so Putin is right to be suspicious of it.  But the evidence doesn’t bear this out; in real life, one-party rule creates a culture of flattery, where high officials like Putin and his defense minister, Sergei Shoigu, never have to face serious criticism for their missteps and can perform their duties in a slovenly or negligent manner until a foreign adversary hands them a humiliating defeat.