<!–

–>

October 24, 2023

What’s a Seldon Crisis? For old science fiction readers, like me, that’s an understood term. One of the truly great science fiction writers of all time was Issac Asimov and his greatest contribution to that genre was the Foundation Series, which featured a character named Hari Seldon.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); document.write(”); googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().addEventListener(‘slotRenderEnded’, function(event) { if (event.slot.getSlotElementId() == “div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3028”) { googletag.display(“div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3028”); } }); }); }

The character Hari Seldon was a mathematician who created what he called “psychohistory.” Psychohistory was “an algorithmic science that allowed him to predict the future in probabilistic terms.” He outlined the future going forward for hundreds, and even thousands of years, and even created a programmable hologram that would appear many years in the future, explaining what people needed to know or what needed to be done regarding a “crisis” he predicted, AKA, a Seldon Crisis.

There was only one problem. As quantum physicist Niels Bohr noted: “It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.” I don’t care how smart anyone may be, or how well-read, or how much experience in life one has, you can’t predict the future unerringly, especially for long periods of time.

As it turned out, in the books, they were facing a crisis Hari hadn’t predicted and couldn’t have predicted, so when Harri’s scheduled hologram appeared, telling them everything was going along wonderfully, so be happy, that created a real Seldon Crisis. Since he was wrong, that upset the apple cart, and that’s where we are today: Entirely too many economists and political leaders have been wrong, it’s getting worse, and entirely too many people are willing to go along with that.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); document.write(”); googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.pubads().addEventListener(‘slotRenderEnded’, function(event) { if (event.slot.getSlotElementId() == “div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3035”) { googletag.display(“div-hre-Americanthinker—New-3035”); } }); }); }

When it comes to economics, I’ve concluded if you put the top 25 economists in the world in a room and asked them if they thought two and two really were four, and to explain why they believed what they believed, you’d get 25 different answers. That’s clearly an oversimplification, but the concern about what comes out of the minds and mouths of economists is valid.

Image by Andrea Widburg using data (rounded) from the US Debt Clock.

Economics, as a field, is in many ways like statistics. Arcane! Economists can make up anything and make it sound like it’s something, but so often, all they’re doing is justifying preconceived notions that are politically expedient. I’ve often stated in my articles that my grandfather, who made his living as a coal miner and a farmer, was one of the world’s great economists. He said if you spend more than you make, you’ll go broke! That’s foundational! That can’t be overturned! Eventually, that becomes reality!

There is one economist/investor I find more interesting and understandable than so many others: John Mauldin. I receive a weekly economics update from him called Thoughts From the Frontline, which is free, so you may wish to subscribe. On Saturday, he sent out a piece called Supercycle of Debt (pdf here).

In his essay, Mauldin discusses books that explain historical cycles, which I’ve believed in for years. I’ve found the patterns of life repeat over and over again. It seems everyone wants to be a real-life Hari Seldon (I do, too) but, while I see historical patterns repeating and I think it’s important to read these “cycle” books for their historical oversight and insights as to what’s going on, I also think they’re not predictively useful. I’ve defined them as historical tarot card reading. While they need to be read, and they outline concepts that are judgmentally useful, they’re not road maps to the future.

However, there is one cycle that always proves true and it’s central to Mauldin’s essay: The world’s governments, along with many individuals individuals, are producing massive amounts of debt. He notes:

Just as an individual can go bankrupt no matter how rich she starts out, a financial system can collapse under the pressure of greed, politics, and profits no matter how well regulated it seems to be.