July 12, 2022

The murder of Seth Rich has been a topic of conspiracy theorists since the 2016 election.  Rich was a young programmer working for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in D.C.  Rich supported Berne Sanders.  The DNC was sandbagging Berne Sanders in favor of Hillary Clinton.  Unknown Assailants shot and killed Rich in July 2016.  The robbers took nothing.  Despite no theft, the DC Metro Police attributed this murder to a random street robbery gone wrong.

Seth Rich (Fox News screengrab cropped)

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609268089992-0’); }); }

Wikileaks published damaging confidential DNC emails in June and July of 2016.  Political pundits, campaign operatives, including major news media, elected officials, Big Tech, Deep State operatives, and others, said the DNC cyber-attack was a product of the Russian Collusion before and after the 2016 election.

Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, denied his source was the Russians.  Assange gave this intriguing statement implying Rich might be his source, “I’m suggesting that our sources take risks . . . and they become concerned to see things occurring like that.”  Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information related to Rich’s murder.

Crooks will lie and can’t keep their stories straight “. . . When more money is involved, the white-collar perps are more adept at concealing, covering up their sins, and hiding where the money went.”  In political corruption investigations, the rules are to follow the money, Honey, Cui Bono – who benefits, who is credible, and who makes provable false statements.

‘); googletag.cmd.push(function () { googletag.display(‘div-gpt-ad-1609270365559-0’); }); }

The way to get to the bottom of the crimes related to Seth Rich’s murder is to invoke the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

The Dem-media cabal gaslighted any who would question their DNC cyber-attack narrative, one of many lies that expose what Kash Patel called is a joint venture criminal conspiracy (a RICO offense).  The conspiracy involved a group of people acting alone or in concert with others to commit crimes with a common purpose against the People of the United States, “including a coup of sitting President.  Using illegal usurpation of power, treason, mutiny, bribery, frauds, thefts of public funds, cover-ups, and obstruction of justice. . .”

The Russian Collusion narrative was destroyed in the trial of DNC Attorney Michael Sussman. It was a disinformation product paid for by the Clinton Campaign, released with a wink and nod to the FBI and the CIA.  Robby Mook testified that Hillary Clinton personally approved the release of the disinformation.   Charles Lipson wrote, “The Sussmann trial, like all modern political scandals, is part of a three-ring circus, showcasing sleazy political enablers, malfeasance by public officials, and biased reporting.  In this circus of deceit, the public has to walk behind the elephants with a huge shovel.”

If Trump was not the Manchurian candidate as alleged. why would the Russians release compromising information on the Clinton Campaign?  What benefit would the Russians accrue from Trump’s election?  First, the Russians were in tight with the Clintons.  And now, even more so with the Biden Administration – follow the money, Honey.

Establishing attribution of a cyber-attack to a foreign state actor or their operatives with any certainty is problematic at best.  These actors have sophisticated tools that can spoof and shift attribution to another entity.  Moreover, the Russians wouldn’t be so careless as to leave digital fingerprints unless intended.

Yet, in the joint release on Oct. 7, by the Department of Homeland Security (Jeh Johnson) and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (James Clapper) approved by and encouraged by Obama .”. . . was ‘confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails,” according to The Epoch Times.